Kingston, Pa. – Aaron Kaufer recently read a response from Rep. Phyllis
Mundy in the Times Leader and Citizen’s Voice accepting his challenge to a
series of debates. Rep. Mundy offered to set up the debate through the League
of Women Voters — an organization that Mundy formally resided over as
president.
Kaufer was pleased with the
enthusiasm to hold a debate in the coming months, but felt it was inappropriate
for the moderators to have ties with one of the participants.
“While I’m confident that the League
of Women Voters would hold an impartial debate, it is unfair for Rep. Mundy to
suggest this as the only debate venue,” Kaufer said. “We need to hold multiple
debates with various moderators to ensure a fair and informative series of
debates.”
Kaufer has suggested several
impartial moderators such as the Chamber of Commerce or a local newspaper or
television station. Aaron is also attending a candidate’s forum at Penn State
Wilkes-Barre and is hoping Rep. Mundy would attend as well.
“If we are to get serious about having
true impartial debates, we need to make sure the moderators are 100 percent objective,”
Kaufer said.Not to be picky but I had Phyllis' response first.
I think that Kaufer should agree to the traditional LWV forum and push for a real debate hosted by an impartial moderator. I nominate the Yonk, he is always fair and knows how to organize an event.
Aaron Kaufer is pictured with past losing 120th HD candidates. Bill James, Tim Mullen, Bill Goldsworthy and John Cordara |
1 comment:
Come on Aaron, just have the debate. The league isn't some fringe, never held a debate group. Maybe Phyllis can debate and empty chair; or have someone show up in a chicken suit.
Post a Comment