Showing posts with label Paul Swiderski. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paul Swiderski. Show all posts

Thursday, February 14, 2008

10th CD update



The big news in the race today is that Dan Meuser still hasn't moved into his new house in Harveys lake.


His explanation: “After doing a little research, we learned that this address needed to reflect where my family spends the predominance of their time,” Meuser said. “Therefore, as my renovations are taking a little longer than expected at Harveys Lake, we decided to use the old address on the petition to fully comply both with the letter and the spirit of the law.”Meuser said he hopes to move “in the near future” and would vote in Harveys Lake in the April 22 primary election.


This has raised a number of questions and Davis Haire’s campaign manager pounced on the news:

“There aren’t too many people in this district who can afford a second house for half a million dollars, especially one purchased for the sole purpose of trying to legitimize a candidacy for Congress,” Whitehead said. “At the end of the day, Davis Haire is the only one who’s actually grown up in this district, the only rural conservative Republican in the race, and the only Republican candidate who can win the general election.”

A local politico had this reaction:

I find the whole situation a little suspicious. While you don't have to live in the district, just in the state, to run, people who circulate petitions for a candidate must reside in the district, just as someone signing. So in Meuser's case he technically could not sign his own petition, nor could he circulate his own petition. There is a place on the bottom for the person who circulates must sign and the signature must be notarized.

I find it odd that someone who is running farmed out his entire petition circulating duties... I wonder if he circulated the petitions himself at all, or is he just paying people off to do it? If he circulated any himself did he sign at the bottom? And what kind of message does it send to those that signed, that the candidate couldn't sign his own petition?

I don't care where he lives because the Constitution says you only have to be a resident of the state that you represent. But you have to wonder how long the renovations of the new house are going to take. Maybe they will be finished sometime in November if he is successful and if not he has a nice remodeled house with a swanky address to put on the market. And who pays $500,000 for a fixer-upper?

Until 2002 all of Luzerne County was part of the 11th CD and you wonder why this good Republican wouldn't run against Kanjorski if he really wanted to make a change. It's not like he gave money to him or anything?

Another question is can he vote in Harveys Lake if he doesn't actually live there? I remember a case from a few years ago when someone was appointed to the Wyoming Valley West School Board but was disqualified because he was using his father's address in Wilkes-Barre to vote. He had to pay a fine for falsifying his voter registration.

Chris Hackett's campaign declined to comment on the residency issue but picked up the support of a former rival:

Congressional Candidate Paul Swiderski Endorses Chris Hackett

DALLAS, PA – Today, Paul Swiderski, former congressional candidate for the 10th district, endorsed Chris Hackett to continue his battle to bring a principled grassroots conservative voice to Washington.

"Throughout my campaign, I was impressed with Chris Hackett and his principled stands on issues. His emphasis on bringing jobs to our region, securing the border, and ending wasteful spending is exactly what we need in Washington," said Swiderski.

"As an accountant, I am acutely aware of the plight of the hard working families of the 10th district. They work overtime, they cut expenses, in an effort to make ends meet, but the government takes such a large portion of their income. I know Chris will be a fighter for lower taxes and lower spending and that's a major reason for my endorsement."
"I am honored to have the endorsement of Paul Swiderski," said Chris Hackett, "He is a proud and principled Republican who I am sure will continue to work hard for our party, our region, and our country."


Friday, February 08, 2008

Swiderski out of PA-10 race


Swiderski Drops Out of Congressional Race; Focuses on Rebuilding County GOP
.
Given the time constraints of tax season and a growing family, I have made a conscious decision to withdraw from the race for the Republican nomination for Congress in Pennsylvania's 10th Congressional District. Before announcing my candidacy I made a promise to my family and clients that they will take precedence over politics, and in keeping that promise I found it difficult to devote the amount of time necessary to effectively run a congressional campaign.
.
A sincere thank you goes out to my wife for supporting my decision to run, to the thousands of wonderful people I have met along the campaign trail, and to the volunteers who worked hard on this grassroots campaign. I met many people who now call me their friend and hope to continue to strengthen the bonds of friendship over the next several years.
.
I plan to stay active in the local party, beginning with making an objective and informed decision to support one of the other remaining candidates in this race and with rebuilding the Luzerne County Republican Party.
.
I have not made a decision as to whom I will endorse but will do so after I meet with each of the three remaining GOP candidates in this race and discuss their positions on the issues.
The absence of an active Republican Party in Luzerne County has been and will continue to be a contributing factor in the number of unsuccessful races for our candidates on the county, state and federal level. Our current and future Republican candidates need the support of an active and organized county party here in Luzerne County. Our county party needs a leader, and I possess the qualities and character of a transformational leader. A good leader knows when to step up and when to step down.
.
My intention of running for Congress is a clear indication that I have a sincere interest in entering public service, and my decision to withdraw from the race to focus on rebuilding the county party best serves the interests of the remaining candidates in the race, the voters of Luzerne County (and the rest of the district), and the Republican Party. My goal is to have the party reorganized by the end of April so that we can help elect and promote quality candidates running in November's election. I welcome your thoughts and anyone who is interested in helping me rebuild the party.

Sunday, February 03, 2008

Meet the candidate


Congressman Paul Kanjorski has a busy Monday planned.

He will be in Monroe County to make an announcement to help homeowners facing potential foreclosures. I received a nice glossy mailer (left) telling us of his concern. The big announcement will be at the Monroe County Administration Building , Public Meeting Room, #203, 1 Quaker Plaza Stroudsburg, PA.

Later in the day he will be talking to some students at Pocono Mountain West High School, Route 940 West, Pocono Summit, PA .

Congressman Chris Carney will be having another town hall meeting at 3:00 PM on Friday, February 22nd at the Northumberland County Career and Arts Center in Shamokin. And he will be having a campaign event titled Kiss the Blarney with Congressman Carney at Genetti's, 1505 Main Street, Dickson City, PA on March 7th.

The Republican 10th CD challengers will be out and about.

Paul Swiderski will be at the Woodloch, Hawley, PA on Monday, February 5th. On Saturday, February 9th you can find him at the Muir House102 State Route 2001, Milford, PA. As a public service to both my readers in Lewisburg he will be at At Vic’s Pub (inside the Victoria House), 2167 Old Turnpike Road, Lewisburg, PA on Monday, February 11th.

You can find a list of all of Swiderski's events here.

If you want to show support for Chris Hackett he is having a Petition Signing Party at his HQ, 23 Dallas Shopping Center, Dallas, PA on Tuesday, Feb. 5th. I'm off work that day and just might make it. It's not on the website calendar yet, get on the stick guys, but his campaign manager informed another blogger that he will be having a meet and greet at the Harveys Lake Grotto on on Feb.11th at 7:00 PM. Dave, you're breaking my heart.

The SU College Republicans will be hosting Davis Haire on Feb 12th. They recently had Paul Swiderski in for a chat. And on Feb. 27th they are sponsoring the first GOP Congressional Primary Debate.

State Rep candidate James May will be kicking off his effort to replace Karen Boback in the 117th district on February 11th at the Twin Stack Center, Natona Room, 1100 North Memorial Highway, Dallas.

Again, a note to all campaigns. Tell me where you guy/girl is going to be and I will be happy to pass it along.

Saturday, February 02, 2008

The money primary

The FEC Pennsylvania 10th CD page has been updated with the raw numbers from the candidates that have filed to date. It doesn't have Paul Swiderski's report yet and Davis Haire is showing he has raised only $450 so far. Chris Hackett and Dan Meuser have about the same amount of cash on hand as of 12/31/07.

Meuser's campaign is happy with the numbers. From a press release:

Momentum for Meuser Continues

Large crowds, major endorsements and fundraising propel Meuser

Today, the Federal Election Commission made available fundraising reports from the Fourth Quarter of 2007. This is the first time the Republican field and the sitting Congressman reported fundraising together. Off the heels of major endorsements and his district wide 2008 Campaign kick-off Tour, Dan Meuser reported over 400k raised in the 4th Quarter.

Meuser out raised Congressman Carney by a 2-1 margin, with the Congressman raising a little over $200,000, and his nearest GOP competitor by over a 5-1 margin, as he raised $70,000 from individuals. Meuser also had 4 times the number of donors as his nearest GOP competitor.

“I am humbled and grateful for the out pouring of support our campaign has received through out the district,” Meuser said. “We will continue work hard and earn the support and trust of voters in the 10th”

Senator Rick Santorum, Mayor Lou Barletta as well as former candidates Ely and Peters have strengthened Dan Meuser’s conservative credentials in his run for the Republican nomination in Pennsylvania’s 10th Congressional District. Dan is honored to have General Dan O’Neill, Keith Eckel and Representative Merle Phillips as the Honorary Chairman for our Campaign to win the Republican nomination.

In addition to the fundraising and endorsements, Dan recently traveled the district kicking off the primary campaign. Dan attracted over 1,000 people combined at events in Northumberland, Luzerne, Lackawanna, Bradford, Pike and Wayne Counties.

Friday, January 18, 2008

Meet the candidate

I've suggested to the 10th CD campaigns that they put their candidate's event schedules on their websites so bloggers like me can tell you, my dear readers, where you can meet their guys. I hope to make this a regular feature.

Paul Swiderski has 3 events this week:

Tonight he will be at the Laurel Villa Country Inn, 2nd & Ann Streets, Milford, PA

On Sunday you can find Paul at the Harding Fire Company meeting

And Wednesday, January 23 he will be joined by two special guests at the Sterling Inn, Route 191, South Sterling, PA

For the details click here.

And Congressman Chris Carney will speak at the 3rd Annual “Wrestling for our Veterans” at the Elk Lake School this Saturday, January 19th at 3:30 PM at Elk Lake School.

In other campaign news we have an announcement from Vince Sweeney.

Sweeney will not seek GOP nod for 10th Congressional seat

Sweeney, 57, of Kingston Township, said he has decided not to enter the race because he likes his job and is happy with his lifestyle. “No matter how I look at things, no matter how I twist and turn, dice and chop, I really like what I’m doing right now...But in two years, who knows?” Sweeney said. “That’s why I can’t see myself supporting any of the other candidates."

I'm glad he got that over with, the suspense was killing me.

Monday, January 07, 2008

Paul Swiderski for Congress, the interview




Some Bio. Where were you born?

I was born in northern New Jersey, Bergen County.

How did you end up here?

After finishing 8th grade my Dad’s company moved to the Crestwood Industrial Park. I went to high school at Bishop Hoban. Then I went to Kings College and the University of Phoenix. I’m now going for my doctorate.

One wag wanted me to ask what sports you played at the University of Phoenix?

Internet Chess.

When I was at King’s I was on the debate team and played on the hockey team for a short time.

How about political experience?

I helped out with Joe Leonardi’s run for Congress and Lisa Baker’s campaign last year. At King’s College I helped to revive the King’s College Republicans serving as Treasurer and President. We did work on Santorum’s campaign and Tom Ridge’s.

You seem to have base in the local party. Are you getting any help from the Luzerne County Republican Party?

What Party?

One thing I was thinking is that after the primary should I not go through is to try do something about the situation with the Luzerne County GOP. I’ve contacted the state GOP numerous times and never got a phone call back. So obviously they are aware of the problems but don’t want to do anything about it.

Why are you running for Congress instead of state rep or county commissioner?

In order to run for any county seat you need the help of the county Republicans. Well? It’s kind of a defunct area. A state office I’ve never considered because I know more about federal issues than state issues.

Why are you running for Congress?

Simply for the same reason you got involved as a political junkie. For years people have know me as a strict conservative who’s always complaining about the way the country is headed. They hear me complaining all the time about liberals who are just destroying our identity as Americans and taking away our rights trying to make us into a nanny state. After several years of complaining people said to me enough of this, instead of complaining why don’t you do something about it. So I took them up on the challenge.

There is an old adage in politics that says challengers don’t win elections, incumbents lose them. What has Chris Carney done to lose the election?

It’s what he hasn’t done. He has done nothing to represent the people and the values of the 10th Congressional district. He has nothing to help small business owners or help the local economy. He has done nothing in Congress except ride Nancy Pelosi’s coattails. But I can tell you he done a lot of things for the 5th district of Iowa. Take a look at his voting record, he has been a staunch supporter of corn subsidies and corn subsidies are bad for Pennsylvania farmers.

So you oppose ethanol subsidies?

Yes.

How about other farm export subsidies?

I oppose all subsidies.

Including dairy price supports?

Yes. I believe that the best way to help our farmers is to let them operate as free enterprises. If you let them operate as free enterprises and don’t restrict their production they are free to produce as much or little as they want.

Let the market decide?

Exactly.

The war in Iraq. On your website you say that there is no homeland security without hometown security and you want to reduce troop levels overseas. Want to expand on that?

Sure. We have troops in 130 countries. We have troops in Germany and Japan and those countries are not a threat to us and I think we could do a better job by bringing those troops home to secure our borders.

Including from Iraq?

Yes.

What kind of timetable?

That’s hard to say. I would personally like to see our troops out ASAP. So would everybody else. It’s kind of a torn position where A) you want them home immediately or B) do what the party wants which is to create a plan forcing the administration to come up with a plan to end sectarian violence. I will go with the party line under one condition and that is I have a proposal for Iraq. That proposal is if we can’t solve the sectarian violence the only solution is split the country into 3 separate factions along sectarian lines.

That’s the Joe Biden Plan?

Yes.

Do you think that the Iraq war has made the United States safer?

I think that Afghanistan made us safer. I think quite possibly we did some good things in Iraq. Including making us safer because all the terrorists are over there hurting our troops and we haven’t had any terrorist attacks here.

How about the governments reaction to 9/11 such as the patriot act and the Military Commissions Act?

There are 2 ways to look at that. One way is that the government is trying to control us the other way to look at it is if you’re not doing anything wrong it shouldn’t bother you. I would choose the latter. If you’re not doing anything wrong the new laws don’t bother me. There a few things that I disagree with that create a strain, especially for us in the tax preparation industry.

One part of the Military Commissions Act that really bothers me is that the President can declare a US citizen in the United States an enemy combatant and hold them without haebeus corpus. Do you agree with that?

If there is just cause for it then sure.

But how do you know that there is just cause if you don’t appear before a judge and the government charges you with a crime?

That’s one of the bad things about these laws. There are good points and bad points. One of the bad points is that do create some restrictions on the American people. I’m against any law that takes away our rights and freedoms. However we do have certain controls in place in this country as is that will allow us to find US citizens that want to cause harm to our country. The FBI is one of them.

Would you describe yourself as maybe more of a libertarian?

I don’t know about Libertarian because libertarians believe certain things and I believe some things that are both conservative and libertarian. I think the thing that I most have in common with the libertarians is that I want to restore our government to it’s traditional constitutional values. In other words I want to restore the government back to the traditional meaning of our forefathers and the writers of the Constitution.

Give me an example of how the government is straying?

The Patriot Act is one of the things that is harming industry in this area, especially the tax preparation industry and banking. You’re talking about other small businesses being adversely affected by it. Another problem with our government is that are so many laws created to hinder the growth of small businesses. Not just on the federal level but also by the state and county. A perfect example is what is going on in the accounting industry. For over 30 years CPA’s and other agents have been lobbying Congress to change IRS regulations. Right now as it stands you don’t have to be a CPA or someone with an accounting background to do income taxes. The lobbyist argument is that if you have no background in accounting, you’re not a CPA of have any certification you could cause a taxpayer harm because there is a greater chance of error. That premise has never been scientifically tested which is the subject of my doctoral thesis. All these lobbying efforts have started a trend on Capitol Hill. In both houses there are active bills that requiring the IRS to change the regulations by registering all tax preparers regardless of your background. On the surface that doesn’t sound like a bad thing because it’s going to force people who are not like me to go to continuing professional education. But there is a huge fee involved with that, it could cost up to $30,000 just to maintain your license. How is a small business owner going to afford an extra $30,000 in costs.

What is your position on gay marriage?

I am for civil rights. Everybody in this country deserves the same opportunity which means that no one group should be more favored than any other group. We should all be on a level playing field. But gay marriage is not a civil right, gay marriage is more of an oxymoron. Marriage is more of religious right than a civil right. If you look at any of the major religions whether it’s Christianity, Judaism or even the Muslim religion they do not believe in the same sex getting married at all. Marriage is something that is supposed to be sacred and as a Christian I truly believe that when I got married I made a commitment to my wife, to our family and to god. That my wife and I are going to work through any problems that we have and share all the great times as well. And as a Christian it even says in the bible that man and woman are meant to be together and it never says anything about man and man or woman and woman being together.

Do you favor a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage?

Absolutely.

Gay couples adopting kids?

Against it.

Have you given money to any political campaigns?

No but I contribute to good causes. I usually do it anonymously and I don’t like to make a grandstand issue about it. I give 10% of my income to many Christian charities and churches but then again I do it anonymously, I don’t use it as a platform. I don’t say look at me I gave x amount of dollars to the United Way. That’s not something that I believe and there are quotes in the bible that says if you do something like that it will be the reward you will ever get.

Illegal immigration. Hot Topic.

I know it is, secure our borders. Bring our troops home.

Bring the Army home and put them on the Mexican border?

That’s right.

Build a fence?

Sure. Well before I say sure there are different opinions to what way is the best. A fence may be a good thing but fences can be climbed. Every option out there has advantages and disadvantages. I think the best thing to do is to sit down and look at all the options weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each and then come back with a secure plan.

Have you ever known anybody that has gone through the immigration process?

Yes, my parents came here from Poland. I’m a first generation American.

How about recently? The reason I’m bringing it up is because I know some people who have and it’s a paperwork nightmare.

I have a client that just recently earned his citizenship but I haven’t talked to him in detail about the process. I do know that it’s a bureaucratic process and think that there is some red tape that could be cut. Make it easier but don’t give up on the security aspect because we don’t want to let just everybody come through the border. We want to know who is coming.

On that note one of the biggest sources of illegal immigration is people overstaying their visas. What is the solution to stop that?

Well, we already know that they’re in the country. If they’re here on a work visa we know that they are employed somewhere. They are here for a certain period of time and I think there should be some kind of policing function. Not to say you need to look over the shoulder every second of the day. When the visa period ends we should figure out what these peoples plans are.

How about the people that here illegally now, do you favor deporting them?

Yes.

How would you do it?

Well that’s an interesting topic to tackle. First of all you can’t do it the way Lou Barletta did it. Although I do give him credit for trying. First of all if they’re doing something illegal while they are here illegally i.e. if they’re breaking the law have local police departments work with the federal government to get them out of here. I think there is a perfect example as to why we should have local governments working with ICE. The was a police officer killed in Scottsdale, AZ because there was an illegal alien, repeat offender of our laws, ended up killing a police officer. We need to do something about that. I think that we create a law requiring that within 24 hours of being detained that any illegal alien should be turned over to ICE by local police officers. We would be spending a lot less money sending them back and securing our borders than feeding these people in jail.

You mentioned Lou Barletta, do you disagree with his approach?

I do to an extent. Certainly illegal aliens are a problem in Hazleton but you don’t establish Marshall Law without good reason. Not to say what he did was Marshall Law but it comes pretty close to it.

What he tried to do is make landlords into immigration agents. They’re not trained to do that.

Well they’re not. Again, what he tried to do is unconstitutionally enact Marshall Law and that can’t be done. If he wanted to do something about it he should’ve worked with federal authorities.

Do you favor making English the official language of the United States?

Absolutely. It’s not a racist issue it’s just an issue like if I were to move to France and I don’t know the language I’m not going to be very successful there. If we have a national language it would require anybody that wants to come here legally to learn our language. Also, there is another benefit which is no more printing of government material in 2, 3,4 or whatever languages.
.
You signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge as have the other GOP candidates. Is it wise for Congress to tie their hands because you never know when an emergency may pop up such as a war or a major American city being wiped out by a Hurricane?
.
When I signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge I did so in good conscience to agree to oppose any and all efforts to increase marginal income tax rates. The pledge also states that I will oppose efforts to reduce or eliminate deduction or credits unless there is a matched deduction in income tax rates. This is a positive thing. One of the recurring issues on Capitol Hill every tax season is the Buzz that legislators want to get rid of the Child Tax Credit, which helps millions of middle class families every year by getting them up to $1,000 off their taxes per child. By signing the taxpayer Protection Pledge I made a promise to help middle class families by keeping that credit in place, unless tax rates would be reduced to compensate for the elimination of that credit. I don’t buy the argument that because you sign a pledge to keep the Tax rate in line you’re not going to have money available for another Katrina or another 9/11. There’s already enough money in the system to handle these things. Congress just needs to cut spending to have the needed money to deal with emergencies.
.
What specific Government Department or program would you eliminate?
.
Where do I start? For starters, the Federal Reserve has to go. I agree with the checks and balances that are in place to protect American consumers who rely on the banking industry to keep their money safe, and these laws need to remain. The problem with the Federal Reserve is that it’s solution to a financial crunch is to print more money. Over time this made our currency is worth less. I would also repeal the 1974 law that Nixon signed that eliminated out currency from being tied to any metal or commodity. These actions would force Congress to cut costs and become more accountable to its people.
.
The price of gas has a ripple effect through the economy, what is your proposal to lower the cost at the pump?
I would start by reducing or eliminating gas taxes.
.
But gas taxes are dedicated to repair roads and bridges and build more highways.
How would you replace that revenue?
.
In other words, we have enough money in the system dedicated to road repairs, and we need to establish a toll road on I-80 for road repairs? There is plenty of money in the system to pay for highways and the government needs to find ways to stop spending it on other things. We cannot allow our government to continue punishing the taxpayers for the legislators mistakes. We can’t keep letting the Democrats write blank checks.
.
Back to spending, you would eliminate the S-CHIP program?
.
I would eliminate all welfare programs. After all, isn’t that what charities are for? The preamble to the Constitution says we should promote the general welfare not create a welfare state. Promoting the general welfare means that we should be kept reasonably safe to enjoy our freedoms. Welfare programs reduce or eliminate the need for charitable institutions. This leads to fewer jobs and an American society becoming more dependent on the government. Getting rid of welfare programs is a win-win scenario for everyone. More people would work instead of finding excuses to stay home and waste our tax dollars. There would be a higher tax base. More people working and fewer people relying on the government means more money for the government. Charities could create more jobs, and we would get one step closer to self-reliance.
.
Pork. What is your position on earmarks?
.
I oppose earmarks and no special interests are going to be part of my campaign. Earmarks do more harm than good.
.
Recently Congressman Kanjorski secured $50 million for a flood control project in Wilkes-Barre. Isn’t that a good use of government money?
.
He also earmarked $14 million for an inflatable dam and steered millions to a company that his nephews ran that went belly up.
]
On the lighter side, are you a sports fan?
.
I like watching baseball occasionally, and the team I watch is the Phillies. I can never admit to following baseball close enough to hold a conversation on it, but that won’t stop me from buying tickets for a game and taking my six year old daughter for an afternoon out. There’s something special about taking your kid to a baseball game. Football has to be the Eagles and Penn State. My favorite sport is hockey. I grew up in northern New Jersey and will always be a big NJ Devils fan.
.
Any closing thoughts?
.
I plan to run my campaign the same way I do everything else: with the utmost integrity. I don’t believe in telling people what they want to hear. I’d rather tell people the truth. They may not like what they hear sometimes, but in the long run I will gain their trust, respect and ultimately, their vote.














Sunday, January 06, 2008

Blogs popping up

I'll will cross post most of this to NEPA Blogs.

It's election season and as Mark observed a few local political blogs have emerged destined to disappear after the voting in April just like the last couple of elections. I hope a few stick around as I think we need a more diverse local internet debate. The Lehigh Valley has had an explosion of political blogs over the last year as documented by Bernie and maybe something similar will happen up here in NEPA.

A few of the regular commenters on this site have decided they have something to say:

Ignorance is Bliss is written by Right Winger and Vince Sweeney is annoying him.

Eddy, The Angry Republican is, well, angry.

West Side Republican is hoping that the Luzerne County Republican Party gets it's shit together. And so do the rest of us.

Political Rants by Zen says "I am a man that should've started ranting long ago."


Other NEPA Scribes include:


LanceStange is another blog with a Republican point of view.

Big Dan's Big Blog links to many news stories and likes the Ramones but is not a fan of Mona Charen.

Then there is this:

Dan Meuser Is A Character- A self describe parody site. "Somewhat of a political commentary blog. My way to poke fun at local politicians using badly done photoshop."

Some comments on this site are accusing the Hackett campaign of being behind it. I heard from Chris Hackett and he denies any involvement and condemns it.

Expect more of this.

The NRCC has an attack site going after Carney:

The Real Chris Carney cherry picks his votes and puts the Republican spin on them.

On the positive side there is:

Students for Carney

We believe that Chris Carney has been:

A Representative who tells us the truth.

A Representative who shows ethical practices in public and private.

A Representative who displays family values.

A Representative who listens to our community and spends time with constituents like a neighbor.

A Representative who is best suited to deal with our nation’s security.

A Representative who fights for our community's most valuable resource--children and students.


I'm finishing writing up my interview with Paul Swiderski and hope to post it tomorrow. But to keep all my 10th CD race fans happy I have the audio of WKOK's in Sunbury interviews with Hackett and Meuser, just click on the links:

Chris Hackett interview December 20, 2007

Dan Meuser interview January 3, 2008

Thursday, January 03, 2008

Program note

I will be meeting with Republican 10th CD candidate Paul Swiderski Friday at 2PM. If you have any questions you would like me to ask him please leave them in the comments or send me an email.

Saturday, December 29, 2007

Swiderski filed for bankruptcy


Pennsylvania 10th Congressional District Republican candidate Paul Swiderski had a patch of bad luck in 2006 resulting in his company filing for bankruptcy protection. He explained what happened in a post at the West Side Republican. Tip of the green eye shades to The Angry Republican for pointing it out and also comments on the statement. So does Right Winger.



Here is Swiderski's statement:

Against the wishes of my campaign committee, I wish to disclose to you my faults. The voters have a right to know the people who want to represent them. I am making it aware to all of you that I, like any other human being, am not perfect. What we normally have in campaigns are people who try to pretend to be perfect in all respects. I, as an average citizen and a Christian, do not believe in pretending to be someone who I am not. Such a feat can only lead to distrust.

Although 2006 started out well for my firm, it turned out to be a financially terrible year for my business when our area experienced flooding that was not expected. Many small businesses were impacted by this flood and had to close. I lost 43% of my business and had to reorganize. Part of the reorganization plan required that my company file for bankruptcy protection and close the company. Any and all existing clients were transferred to a new enterprise owned by me. I am letting the truth be known about this event because media spin may try to make me look like an incompetent accountant when this is not the case. Certainly, I know how to pay my bills on time, but when you lose 43% of your business there is no way to keep your company thriving. After losing such business, there just simply wasn’t enough revenue to meet business obligations.

There are many reasons for filing for bankruptcy other than financial mismanagement. One such reason is to prevent a law suit. Another reason is to allow a small business owner a “fresh start” due to mishandling of money. My situation was due to neither. I made the mistake of opening a small business out of necessity with very little capital (My wife took ill and I was laid off from my job while taking a leave of absence from work. My employer let me go, and I was denied unemployment. With no money coming in, I had to do something to make money, so I took whatever money I had left - $300 - and advertised that I did tax preparation). As the business grew, I kept investing whatever little money was left over to keep growing the business. After the flood of 2006 came, over half of my receivables became uncollectible. At the same time, my home had flood damage (I don’t live in a flood plain, so I was never required to have flood insurance, and my homeowners’ insurance didn’t cover the damage. I had to spend close to $10,000 replacing appliances, repairing my foundation, and taking care of mold remediation.).

Certainly, my company had financial obligations to meet, but when your revenue drops to the point that you can no longer meet those obligations, you have to cut back on costs to make an honest attempt at making those payments. A loss of 43% of revenue makes it difficult to do so. I had no other choice but to close that business. I live very modestly, so there wasn’t much room to cut back costs. My home is nothing to brag about, my wife and I don’t drive luxury cars, and my only school-age child goes to public school.

I am not proud of having to make the decision to close my company, but in order to protect whatever assets I had worked hard to earn I had no other choice. Any small business owner in my position would have made the same choice. A big business, however, can take a big hit and move on. Throughout this short period of time – even though money was tight - I still was able to and continue to make my personal monthly obligations on time.

Despite the fact that I had a horrible year in 2006, my clients still trust me to manage their books. Two of Donald Trump’s businesses filed for bankruptcy within the last ten years, and people continue to do business with him. Milton Hershey failed at business six times before starting his famous chocolate enterprise. Throughout his bad years, he had investors who believed in his ideas. People still shop at Kmart. The failure of a small business due to uncontrollable circumstances should not deter the owner from representing other small business owners in Congress. Rather, my experience is nothing more than a perfect example of the hardship of small business ownership which relates me more to the common entrepreneur in the 10th congressional district. If anyone should represent small business owners in government, it should be someone who can relate to them.

I have been open and honest with my clients about this incident, and I feel that the voters deserve to know the truth as well from the source. Part of my decision to run for is so that I can help prevent the loss of other small businesses.

Thursday, December 13, 2007

PA 10th CD news



Swiderski makes it official. From a press release:

Local Small Business Owner Officially Announces Candidacy for Congress



EXETER TOWNSHIP, PA - Paul R. Swiderski, MBA, a self-employed accountant and small business consultant has officially announced his candidacy for U.S Representative in the 10th congressional district. I filed the appropriate papers with the Federal Election Commission in October, but I decided to delay the campaign by two months because my wife and I recently had a new baby. My family and I decided that it was best to wait until we were accustomed to our new life changes before kicking off the campaign, said Paul.


I am running to represent the people of the 10th Congressional District. Our elected officials generally don't represent anyone except their own interests, which solves none of the problems we have here in NEPA, elsewhere in the U.S. and overseas. Politics as usual needs to end, and if we are going to make any changes we need to begin electing into office individuals who truly care about the people they are supposed to represent and people who are serious about restoring America and fighting to protect traditional values.

Millionaires trying to buy their way into Congress, large corporate executives, and politicians who have been in office way too long are out of touch with the people they are supposed to represent. They don't live the same way as the voters in the district do. They don't experience the same problems that most people in the district do. They certainly can't relate to the voters and therefore cannot effectively represent the people.

Among the candidates competing for the opportunity to take back the seat lost to Chris Carney last election, only I can relate to, in all respects, the people, values and issues impacting the people of the 10th Congressional District. I am neither a millionaire, corporate executive, nor an experienced politician. I am merely a small business owner in NEPA who has the same concerns as most of the people in the district. The need for affordable quality health insurance, lower gas prices and home heating costs, lower taxes, and accountability in government top the list of concerns.

With an education from Bishop Hoban High School (now Holy Redeemer) and a B.S. degree in accounting from King's College, Paul has his roots grounded firmly in the soil of northeastern Pennsylvania. Aside from being a businessman, Paul enjoys spending time outdoors hunting, fishing, camping, hiking and foraging. He is also a proud Christian and family man: fortunate to be the husband to the most beautiful wife in the world and blessed with three wonderful children, ages 6, 2, and 5 weeks.

Interview update: I will be meeting with Paul just after the New Year and Dan Meuser the week before. As we get closer I'll put up an open thread for your questions.

Saturday, December 01, 2007

Swiderski for Congress


Paul Swiderski, candidate for the Republican nomination in the 10th CD of Pennsylvania has just agreed to do an interview with me. I also extended an invitation to Dan Meuser but he hasn't got back to me yet. I talked with Chris Hackett a few months back and hope to do it again. After the primary I hope to sit down with Congressman Carney if Rebecca lets me.

I will be meeting with Paul to discuss boring stuff like issues. I hope to talk with all the candidates before the primary. If anyone has any questions they would like me to ask Paul please leave them in the comments or send me an email. Be nice folks and please keep it clean.

Monday, October 22, 2007

Swiderski on S-CHIP

I've asked all the Pennsylvania 10th Congressional District candidates to share their thoughts on the S-CHIP legislation.

Here is Paul Swiderski's reply:


Like many other social welfare programs, S-CHIP is designed to provide temporary relief and assistance for lower-income families. However, the families who use these resources nationally tend to form a long-term dependence. S-CHIP is a liberal attempt to push our nation towards a nanny state. Rather than focusing on the rising cost of health insurance, Nancy Pelosi and the misguided San Francisco liberals are promoting increased government involvement in the health care system. I believe in the ability for our state to administer its own program, but I do not trust other states and localities to act in the best interest of taxpayers.

If we do not contain the involvement of the Federal Government, we will be issuing a blank check for those who act against the best interests of the 10th Congressional District. Other states have made it clear they will use such assistance to indirectly pay for the health and welfare of illegal immigrants in this country.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-07-07-sf-health-plan_x.htm

Can you trust “Nanny Pelosi” to make the best use of taxpayers money? Can you trust “Nanny Pelosi” to take care of you?

Involvement by the Federal Government in education and health care has increased costs for everyone. Inflation for education increases at twice the national rate. Health care costs have averaged double-digit inflation for the last decade. This is all due to the failure of the Federal Government to provide.

We cannot fall for the Democratic Party’s red herring of “protecting the children”. “Protecting the children” has limited our freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. The Democrats “protecting our children” has led to families with both parents working full-time jobs to provide the basic necessities. “Protecting our children” has given us a society of children raised by television and outsiders versus parents. “Protecting our children” has led to a national crisis of people looking for the next quick buck instead of promoting innovation and hard work. Instead of letting the government protect our children, we should better empower parents to provide the financial and emotional needs for their families.

We must look for new ways to contain costs within the health care system. We will continue to receive “hamburger” care at “caviar” prices because the free market is not allowed to operate. The government pays for half of all medical expenditures in this country. The government has no incentive to control costs. Instead, we pay too much for lawyers looking for their one big lottery ticket.

I promote we should assist the health care system in this country by tackling the root causes of the problem:

Ending the practice of frivolous law suits within the medical profession

Capping medical malpractice damages

Investing in medical technology advances

Promoting greater education for healthier living

Empowering the government to better negotiate medical costs

Protecting the doctors and medical professionals who take care of us

Tax breaks for small and medium-sized businesses to join purchasing cooperatives with other local businesses

Improving the local economy to promote the affordability of health insurance for all citizens within the 10th

My solutions will not make national headlines because they do not involve the extension of a larger national bureaucracy. My solutions are neither sexy nor do they contain any buzzwords drawn up by numerous advertising agencies. If given the opportunity to serve you, my solutions would just work.

Sunday, October 21, 2007

10th CD update

Candidates are dropping in and out of the race for the Republican nomination in Pennsylvania's 10th Congressional District. The big news today is that former New Jersey state senator John Scott has withdrawn from the contest.

That leaves 4 announced candidates, Chris Hackett, Shavertown, owner of One Source Staffing; Dan Meuser, Harveys Lake, president of Pride Mobility Products; Donald Ely, Sunbury, a retired schoolteacher and minister; and Paul R. Swiderski, Harding, self-employed. Previously Joe Peters and Tom Marino ruled out a bid and Vince Sweeney is still thinking about it.

There is still time for someone else to jump into this thing and a commenter gives us a heads up to another prospective candidate; I heard that Amber from Club 10 will enter the race. She is raising funds Thursday night in the VIP room.

The announced candidates have websites in various stages of development.

Incumbent Democrat Chris Carney's site has just been given a makeover.

Paul Swiderski was the first of the challengers to pop up on the web. The best feature of it is his campaign blog.

Dan Meuser has his bio and sketches out some policy positions with a promise of more content to come.

This one is my favorite so far. Don Ely has bullet points saying what he is for and against without any explanation of his positions. I'm sure he will expand on them later. Some of what he OPPOSES caught my eye; Law of the Sea U. N. Treaty, U. N. Taxing of Americans, North American Union and the ever popular The Whole Liberal “Hate America” Agenda.


Chris Hackett is a slacker in this category with only a Coming Soon. But he got some press this week with the Pocono News and The Wayne Independent covering his announcement tour. And the DC publication The Hill has this blurb:

Republican candidates hoping to unseat vulnerable House Democrats by and large are sticking by their party’s line in opposition to the children’s healthcare bill President Bush vetoed earlier this month....if GOP congressional hopefuls are fearful that backing Bush and the House Republican leadership against the SCHIP bill will hurt their campaigns, they aren’t showing it in their public statements.

In Pennsylvania, businessman Chris Hackett, one of two top Republican contenders running against Rep. Chris Carney (D), cited Carney’s vote for SCHIP as one of several that “don’t reflect the values of the district in any way, shape or form.”


Asked if the president was right to veto the bill, Hackett said, “Absolutely, yes.”

Ace TL political reporter Bill O'Boyle has the spin from the NRCC and Carney's office on the race.

Ken Spain, press secretary at the National Republican Congressional Committee, said he’s not surprised by the large field.


“Chris Carney’s record of voting for tax hikes and runaway spending has made him an easy target so it should come as no surprise that he has attracted stiff Republican opposition in this race,” Spain said. “Every day that he allows himself to serve as a rubber stamp for this wildly unpopular Democrat-led Congress, he provides more incentive for Republican challengers to line up against him and send a message to Washington.”

That drew a response from Rebecca Gale, spokesperson for Carney in Washington.

“Congressman Carney is proud of his record as a fiscal conservative,” Gale said. “The NRCC is just grasping at straws since their first-tier candidates have already backed away from challenging Congressman Carney.”

It's good to see Hackett address the issues in the news. I've asked the other candidates to tell us what they think of the SCHIP bill but for some reason they are being shy. I disagree with Hackett on this issue but he his willing to take a position and defend it.

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

Paul Swiderski for Congress

We have another Republican candidate in the Pennsylvania 10th Congressional District. At rate this is going we could have a primary with so many candidates that 25% of the vote could win the nomination.


That makes 4 declared candidates, the others are John Scott, Don Ely and Chris Hackett. A few others are thinking about a run including Dan Meuser, who made news this week by buying a new house that is actually in the district. He is moving from his $2 million digs in Jackson Twp that is just outside the district into a more modest $500,000 adobe in Harveys Lake.


Here is Paul Swiderski's email announcement via a few friends:

Dear Sir/Madam:

I am writing to introduce myself as a GOP candidate for U.S.Representative for Pennsylvania's 10th Congressional District and to request your support.

Among the candidates competing for the opportunity to take back the seat lost to Chris Carney last election, only I can relate to, in all respects, the people, values and issues impacting the people of the 10th Congressional District. I am a small business owner who has the same concerns as most of the people in the district. The need for affordable quality health insurance, lower gas prices and home heating costs, lower taxes, and accountability in government top the list of concerns. I truly care about the people and future of northeastern Pennsylvania(NEPA).

There is a lack of good paying professional jobs in the region,which is causing our young talent who were born in, grew up in, and went to school in NEPA to leave the area, and in most cases, the commonwealth of PA altogether. There is also a growing elderly population in NEPA, and if people are leaving because of a lack of professional jobs, there will be a lack of tax revenue needed to effectively sustain the economy and our parents and grandparents.

The Wilkes-Barre and other local Chambers of Business and Industry (AKA, Chamber of Commerce), together with area democrats, have stood in the way of economic growth. If this trend continues, our area's economy will continue to move on a downward spiral.

In short, I am running for Congress because I want a better, stronger, healthier United States of America and a better NEPA. I am respectfully requesting your consideration to endorse my candidacy and support this campaign. Feel free to contact me to inquire about my position on the issues and/or to arrange for a meeting.

Sincerely,

Paul R. Swiderski, MBA

Candidate for U.S. Representative10th Congressional District (Pennsylvania)

He is also the first Republican candidate with a website: www.abetternepa.org

The site has a campaign blog that throws the first punch in the race:

Dan Meuser doesn't represent the people of PA 10th District

Dan Meuser is a very wealthy man who is willing to spend over $1.2 million of his own money to run for U.S. Representative in Pennsylvania's 10th Congressional District. The majority of the people living in the district do not have anywhere near that amount of money to use as discretionary funds. I don't think he can relate to the average voter when he brags about how much money he has to spend on a campaign out of pocket.

Dan Meuser does not live in the 10th District, but he did casually mention that would just buy another home in the district to run. I'm certain that the average voter in the 10th District can't just buy a second home at free will. Many of the voters whom I spoke to occasionally have problems keeping up with their mortgage and monthly bills. Meuser sounds like a man who doesn't know what it's like to be in a tight money situation when it comes to personal finance.

Dan Meuser contributes money to democrats like Hillary Clinton, Charlie Rangel, Paul Kanjorski and many more, but he's considering running on the republican ticket. Dan Meuser isn't interested in representing the people of the 10th District. He just wants to buy his way into office. Is this the man you want representing you in Congress?